SPOTLIGHT On IRAQ
The situation in Iraq is changing so rapidly that it is
necessary to state the date of writing-22 May, 2004.
The essentials are quite clear: support for Bush's illegal
invasion is declining in the USA and opposition to the
invasion is growing in Iraq.
The press is, and has been, full of stories and photos
about the US treatment of Iraqi prisoners. This journal
has been very critical of the illegal US invasion of Iraq
(with the support of Blair and Howard); some readers
might think that our condemnation of what has happened
is just a continuation of our opposition. So we refer to the
US journal Time. The front cover of the next to last issue
consists of a photo of the top half of a naked male body,
hands tied behind the back, head and face hooded, and
across the top a large heading "IRAQ: HOW DID IT
COME TO THIS?". The main article (nine pages) has a
huge two-page heading "IRAQ: THE SCANDAL'S
GROWING STAIN" and a sub-head "Abuses in Iraq . . .
shock the world and will roll the Bush administration".
And the story goes on about the man on the front cover,
who was photographed while his whole body was naked
and he felt his penis in a mouth. He was in custody for
nine months and was never charged or interrogated.
Since then there are dozens more photographs of
humiliation and atrocity.
...One of six US soldiers charged
with crimes against prisoners has
been convicted...
One of six US soldiers charged with crimes against
prisoners has been convicted. Imprisonment for 12
months was ordered, his rank reduced to private and he
will be discharged. It has been revealed that his sentence
was as a result of a plea bargain on his undertaking to
give evidence against other accused. If his evidence
against the others is judged satisfactory, his penalty can
be reduced and even entirely cancelled. It also appeared
at his trial that it was claimed the soldiers were following
orders and that printed instructions containing orders
about interrogation which breached international law
were displayed on prison walls. The US is desperately
trying to defend its officers. Look out for more
revelations.
Donald Rumsfeld has admitted to Congress that he knew
months ago that crimes of this sort were being committed
but he failed to report the matter to Bush or Congress
and, more importantly, failed to put a stop to them. US
newspapers, largely circulating in the army, have called
for his sacking. Bush still assures his support.
...A little more than a year ago,
George Bush announced that the
war was over...
The huge amount of press attention to this matter has led
to the obscuring of another matter of equal importance. A
little more than a year ago, George Bush announced that
the war was over and that "Iraq will be free, democratic
and independent from as soon as the transfer of
sovereignty is complete on June 30, 2004". He has now
announced that there is to be a change. The US will have
control of Iraq security (and Howard immediately says
that Australian troops will be there longer than
announced).
Obviously the new government will not have sovereign
power while the US controlled forces remain. Will the
new government be able to revoke order 39 made by Paul
Bremer head of the US Coalition Provisional Authority?
This Order privatised 200 Iraqi state companies; decreed
that foreign firms can retain 100% ownership of Iraqi
banks, mines and factories; and can move 100% of their
profits out of Iraq (as reported in our last issue). In any
event it means no democracy for Iraq. But since then
there have been further developments. It has now been
stated quite publicly by Bremer and by Colin Powell that
the US will withdraw all forces from Iraq after July 1 if
requested by the Iraqi provisional government to do so.
...There are many indications that
opposition to the US occupation is
growing...
There are many indications that opposition to the US
occupation is growing. The recent outright revolt in
Fallujah illustrates the position. The US army tried to
destroy the insurgents; they were unable to do so and
eventually withdrew. They have now put an army officer
into Fallujah to try to solve the problem-to get the
Sunni to accept the US presence. Guess who? An officer
from Saddam Hussein's army!
It has also been reported that there is so much violence in
the country against the US presence and that many of the
foreign companies that have been given contracts by
Bremer to rebuild what has been smashed up, have
withdrawn from the job.
But it may well be thought that the most significant
evidence of the growing Iraqi opposition to the invasion
is the recent killing by insurgents of Izzadine Saleem, the
president of the Iraqi governing council, established by
the US to advise on the setting up of the provisional
government on June 30. And to that can be added the
fact that many more US soldiers have been killed since
Bush announced the war ended than were killed in the
war (and even still more injured).
Finally, can you still remember the reason advanced by
Bush and his top officials for the war (and by Blair and
Howard)? Weapons of mass destruction. It is clear that
Iraq has none and Colin Powell has now
publicly
admitted that the main argument that he put to the
Security Council in support of Iraq's possession of
WMDs turns out to be false, based on deliberately false
intelligence.
This invasion of Iraq was, and is, a breach of
international law. It also was a deliberate breaching of the
Charter of the United Nations Organisation, which is
specifically approved by an Act of our Federal Parliament
(Act No. 32 1945), and was also approved by US
congress. Equally important, it is an offence against the
rights of the mainly Muslim people of Iraq, deeply
resented by other Muslims, and plays into the hands of
terrorists, thereby increasing the threat of terrorism in
Australia.
Howard has damaged Australian interests by joining the
totally illegal United States' invasion of Iraq.
Meanwhile the misery of Palestine continues.
The arrogance, ignorance and insensitivity shown by US
forces against the Iraqis is paralleled by the US lack of
sympathy for, or understanding of, the plight of the
Palestinians and its support for Israel's brutal, oppressive
and dehumanising. military occupation of Palestine.
...Howard has damaged Australian interests by joining the totally illegal US invasion of Iraq. Meanwhile the misery of Palestine
continues...
Israel has now confiscated 24 per cent of the area of the
West Bank and Gaza and 89 per cent of East Jerusalem.
Israel's human rights violations are systemic and endless.
Israeli tyranny has reduced the Palestinians' daily life to
misery and humiliation.
In the latest atrocity on May 19, 2004 , Israeli forces
fired on some 2,000 unarmed Palestinians who were
peacefully demonstrating in Rafah to protest the ongoing
Israeli invasion of the adjoining Rafah refugee camp
which has resulted in over 40 deaths, hundreds wounded,
and over 1,000 Palestinians made homeless as Israeli
bulldozers demolished their homes in front of their eyes.
At least ten of the marchers, are confirmed dead and least
50 others were wounded.
Sharon's recent proposed withdrawal from the Gaza Strip
would vacate some 7,500 settlers who occupy 40 per cent
of Gaza's land. But in return he would perpetuate Israel's
illegal occupation of 300 settlements in the West Bank,
with a population of 400,000. This would prevent for ever
the emergence of a sovereign Palestinian state.
The Howard government in line with its "all the way with
the USA" policy has voiced no protest about the plight of
Palestine. We must all protest and push for massive
international condemnation of Israel if the rape of
Palestine and the dreadful suicide bombers' response is to
be halted.